Tag Archives: business

2026 California Employment Update – New Year, New You!

As we embark on 2026, here’s what you need to know to tackle the new employment laws!

Employee Pay. As of January 1, 2026, California’s minimum wage is $16.90. This covers all California employers, regardless of size, except fast food restaurant employees, who must be paid a minimum of $20.00 per hour and certain health care workers who also have a higher minimum. Be mindful of local minimum wage ordinances, too, which are usually based on the employee’s work location. 

The minimum salary that must be paid to exempt employees in California is a function of the minimum wage. Workers paid under the Administrative, Executive or Professional exemption must be paid at least two times the appropriate minimum wage based on a 40-hour workweek: $70,304. The Computer Software overtime exemption requires a minimum hourly rate of pay of $58.85, which means a minimum monthly salary of $10,214.44, or minimum annual salary of $122,573.13. Remember that the exempt salary rate is the minimum – there is no such thing as a part-time exempt salary rate (you cannot pay a pro-rata amount).

Paid Family Leave Expansion (SB 590). California’s Paid Family Leave is modified as of the first of the year to track California’s Paid Sick leave law and the California Family Rights Act and now includes an employee’s “designated person.” An employee who takes time off to care for a seriously ill “designated person” can receive the wage replacement benefits under California’s Paid Family Leave (PFL) program. A PFL “designated person” is a person who is related by blood or whose association with an individual is the equivalent of a family relationship. The rule requires that when an employee initially requests PFL benefits to care for a designated person, they must identify the designated person and under penalty of perjury attest that the person is related by blood or that the person is in an equivalent family relationship.

Workplace Know Your Rights Act (SB 294). Starting February 1, 2026, employers must provide a written notice to each current employee of certain employee rights. Employees hired after February 1 must also be provided the notice, and everyone is to get it annually. Don’t reinvent the wheel – use the notice that the Labor Commissioner developed – available here in English and here in Spanish.

The notice must clearly explain workers’ rights about:

  • Workers’ compensation benefits, including disability pay and medical care for work-related injuries or illness, and contact information for the Division of Workers’ Compensation.
  • A summary of employee’s rights to immigration inspection notices and protections against unfair immigration-related practices.
  • Union organizing and concerted activity.
  • Constitutional rights during interactions with law enforcement at the workplace, including Fourth and Fifth Amendment protections.

The notice must also include:

  • New legal developments under laws enforced by the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, as identified by the Labor Commissioner.
  • A list of enforcement agencies responsible for those rights.

The Labor Commissioner will post a video online by July 1, 2026, that will explain employers’ obligations and employees’ rights.

By March 20, 2026 (and upon hire thereafter), employers must give employees the opportunity to identify an emergency contact. Employers must notify an employee’s designated emergency contact if the employee is arrested or detained on the worksite. If the action occurs off-site, but during work hours or while the employee is performing work, the employer must notify the contact if the employer has actual knowledge of the arrest or detention.

Employers may not discriminate or retaliate against an employee for exercising or attempting to exercise their rights under the Act. The Labor Commissioner, a public prosecutor, or the employee (in a civil action) may enforce the Act, and the employee may obtain injunctive relief, penalties, punitive damages, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. The penalties for violations of this new Act are per employee per violation, up to a maximum of $10,000 per employee.  

Employee Mobility (AB 692). California generally does not allow employers to restrict employee mobility; noncompete provisions and agreements are unlawful. The legislature is now working to limit the use of “Stay or Pay” provisions that restrict movement. The new law makes it unlawful for contracts entered into after January 1, 2026, to require employees to pay their employer, training provider, or a debt collector for a debt if the employee’s employment or work relationship ends. It also bars contracts that impose any penalty, fee or costs on a worker if the employment ends. Debts, penalties, fees, or costs include employment-related or education related costs, replacement hiring fees, retraining fees, reimbursement for immigration or visa-related costs, and other fees. Enforcement is by a civil action by the employee (and can include others similarly situated).

The new law allows some repayment obligations to continue:  some signing bonuses; government loan assistance or repayment programs, tuition assistance, enrollment in apprenticeship programs, and contracts related to the lease, finance, or purchase or residential real estate.    

Preservation of Training Records (SB 513). This new law expands employer recordkeeping obligations under Labor Code section 1198.5 to include education and training records that you already maintain as part of the personnel file . Employers must retain these records, which should include the names of the employee and training provider, duration and date of the training, the core competencies of a training (such as any skills in equipment or software obtained in the training), and the resulting certification or qualification. With this change, employers must include education and training records as part of the employee’s personnel file when requested under section 1198.5.

Amendment to Equal Pay Act (SB 642). This new law continues the revisions and modifications to the Equal Pay Act. The definition of “pay scale” is amended so that job postings must include “a good faith estimate of the salary or hourly wage range that the employer reasonably expects to pay for the position upon hire.”

The amendment also adds definitions for “sex,” “wages,” and “wage rate” to Labor Code 1197.5, which prohibits employers from paying employees who perform substantially similar work differently based on the employee’s sex. The new definitions clarify that “wages” and “wage rate” include all forms of pay, including but not limited to salary, overtime pay, bonuses, stock or stock options, profit sharing and bonus plans, vacation and holiday pay, and other benefits. Employers must ensure that employees who perform substantially similar work are not paid differently and are not entitled to different benefits on the basis of sex. The Act’s language regarding equal pay for substantially similar work has also been amended to apply to employees of “another sex,” (instead of the “opposite sex”), making the language inclusive of non-binary people.

The amendment expands the statute of limitations from two to three years, and employees may also obtain relief for the entire period that the violation existed up to a maximum of six years. The new law adds language specifically outlining that a cause of action for violation of the Act occurs when: (1) an alleged unlawful compensation decision or other practice is adopted; (2) an individual becomes subject to an alleged unlawful compensation decision or other practice; or (3) when an individual is affected by the application of an alleged unlawful compensation decision or other practice.

This is just a summary of some of the changes to California’s employment laws.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions!

2025 Employment Law Update

Happy New Year! My resolution: maybe, slightly less procrastination. But . . . for the most part, these laws don’t take effect until January 1, 2025. So, I’m not really “late.” (The exception is PAGA reform).

Here’s what you need to know to tackle the new employment laws for 2025!

The PAGA Reforms (AB 2288 and SB 92). In June 2024, several reforms of PAGA were enacted. In brief, if a California employer receives a notice on behalf of a former or current employee about alleged PAGA violations, legal counsel should be contacted immediately as there are important steps that can be taken to minimize liability. In addition, employers receive significant benefits under the reforms if they have already taken steps to identify and remedy wage and hour issues in their pay practices.

It is imperative that you regularly review your timekeeping and pay procedures. An annual detailed wage and hour audit and regular review of employer practices is critical to avoid or at least minimize expensive representative claims. Nonexempt employees’ meal breaks must be no less than 30 minutes. Rounding is not acceptable. And the meal period must be taken before the end fifth hour of work. Employers must provide nonexempt employees with the opportunity to take their rest breaks in a timely manner. When an employee is entitled to overtime pay, paid sick leave, a meal period premium, or a rest break premium, the employer must consider all forms of compensation and determine the regular rate of pay for such payments – an amount higher than the hourly rate of pay.

Minimum Wage Increase. As of January 1, 2025, all California employers, regardless of size, must pay their employees at least a minimum wage of $16.50 per hour. Please be mindful of local minimum wage ordinances. 

The minimum salary that must be paid to exempt employees in California is a function of the minimum wage. Workers paid under the Administrative, Executive or Professional exemption must be paid at least two times the appropriate minimum wage based on a 40-hour workweek: $68,640.  The Computer Software overtime exemption requires a minimum hourly rate of pay of $56.97, which means a minimum monthly salary of $9,888.12, or minimum annual salary of $118,657.43.

Accrued Vacation and California Paid Family Leave (AB 2123). Employers cannot require employees to take up to two weeks of earned but unused vacation days before they can begin receiving wage replacement benefits under the Paid Family Leave program. Employers should review their handbooks and other policy documents to delete any such rules.

Restrictions on Driver’s License Requirements (SB 1100). Employers cannot tell job applicants that a driver’s license is required for a job unless the employer reasonably expects driving to be a job function for the position and that using an alternative form of transportation would not be comparable in terms of time and cost to the employer. Employers should review their job postings, applications, and offer letters to remove any unnecessary (and now illegal) driver’s license requirements.

Changes and Expansions to Protections for Victims of Violence (AB 2499).  This law expands the protections available for crime victims. It broadens the definition of “victims” to include those who are a victim of certain acts of violence (domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, among others) regardless of whether anyone is arrested for, prosecuted, or convicted of committing any crime. In addition, the law provides that employees may use vacation, personal leave, or paid sick leave for any protected time off for jury duty, court appearances, and for victim time off. Finally, employers must provide written notice of the rights established under this bill to new hires, to all employees annually, at any time upon request, and any time the employer becomes newly aware that an employee or an employee’s family member is a victim. Employer handbooks, onboarding documents and other employee resources should be reviewed and updated.

Captive Audience Meetings are Banned (SB 399). California employers must be cautious about required/mandatory meetings. Employers will be subject to a civil penalty and civil action if they hold mandatory meetings where the purpose of the meeting is to communicate the employer’s opinion about religious or political matters. “Political matters” means matters relating to elections for political office, political parties, legislation, regulation, and the decision to join or support any political party or political or labor organization. “Religious matters” means matters relating to religious affiliation and practice and the decision to join or support any religious organization or association.

Model Whistleblower Poster (AB 2299). Employers that post the Labor Commissioner’s model notice about whistleblower protections will be deemed in compliance with the state’s whistleblower posting requirements. You can get a copy here. Print it out and post it today.

Intersectionality of Protected Characteristics (SB 1137). Several California laws – including the FEHA – are amended to clarify that their protections prohibit discrimination on the basis of individual protected characteristics and where there is intersectionality (i.e., a combination) of two or more protected characteristics. This law confirms existing caselaw, but it is an important clarification.

“Social Compliance Audits” (AB 3234). Some employers voluntarily conduct “social compliance audits.” These audits are voluntary, non-governmental inspections or assessments of an employer’s operations or practices to evaluate whether the operations or practices are in compliance with state and federal labor laws, including wage and hour and health and safety regulations, including those regarding child labor. This new law requires employers who conduct these audits to post on their website a report detailing the audit’s findings of the employer’s compliance with child labor laws.   

This is just a summary of some of the changes to California’s employment laws.

Please do not hesitate to contact us with questions!

2024 California Employment Law Update

Not to be extreme, but didn’t we just do this?!?!? Time is ridiculous.

Here’s what you need to know to tackle the new employment laws for 2024!

California Paid Sick Leave Expansion – SB 616

Since 2015, California has required employers to provide Paid Sick Leave (“PSL”). Employees may take PSL for their own, or a family member’s, health condition or preventive care or time off to seek medical care. Over the years, the law has been expanded and includes time off for an employee who needs time off to obtain psychological counseling, safe housing, and other measures related to domestic violence situations, sexual assault or stalking. Employees’ family members are defined to include an employee’s child, parent, spouse, domestic partner, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, stepparent and stepchild, as well as a “designated person,” which is defined as any individual related by blood or whose association with the employee is the equivalent of a family relationship.

Now, SB 616 requires employers to let employees accrue up to a maximum of 80 hours of PSL, or for the employer to award an annual allotment of 40 hours of PSL. An employer can be more generous and allow a higher accrual cap or give a larger annual allotment. These are the new minimums you must provide.

As before, to be eligible for PSL, an employee must work in California for 30 or more days within one year from their date of hire. There is no minimum number of employees that an employer must have to be covered. Employees may begin using their accrued PSL after 90 days of employment. Unused PSL carries over from year to year and continues to accrue up to the maximum accrual unless the employer uses the allotment method. Employers are not required to pay PSL upon separation from employment.

Employers must ensure that the expansion of hours – either the increase in the cap or the annual allotment – occurs on January 1, 2024. So, even if you have traditionally used July 1 as the allotment date, you must modify your program.

Excluded from this law are most collectively bargained workplaces, employees of in-home supportive services, certain transportation workers.

Some employers offer “Paid Time Off” to cover a variety of situations – vacation, illness or injury, etc. If you provide PTO, you do not need to provide PSL so long as the PTO meets the minimum requirements under the law. If your PTO policy does not cover part-time or temporary employees, you must either extend PTO to them or provide a stand-alone PSL policy.

Also, it is important that you confirm your employees’ itemized wage statements show the accurate amount of paid sick leave accrued, allotted and/or used for each pay period. This is a “hot topic” for wage and hour claims.

Employers with “no-accrual paid time off” policies may comply with this requirement by stating  “no-accrual PTO” on the wage statement. Some locally mandated paid sick leave rules may not accept this.

Reproductive Loss Leave – SB 848

Eligible employees who work for employers with five or more employees (and public sector employers) may take up to five days off following a “reproductive loss event.” Such an event is a failed adoption, failed surrogacy, miscarriage, stillbirth or an unsuccessful assisted reproduction.  If an employee experiences more than one reproductive loss event within a 12-month period, the employee may take up to a maximum of 20 days off.

To be eligible, the employees must have been employed for at least 30 days prior to the leave.  Like the bereavement leave enacted last year, the time off must be taken within three months of the event, but the days off do not need to be consecutive. If the employee is already on a leave of absence at the time of the loss, the employee has three months from the end of the leave to take the reproductive loss time off.

This leave is unpaid, but employees may substitute their accrued paid time off for the unpaid time. And the new law requires employers to maintain employee confidentiality relating to the employee’s time off.

Please note, this new leave is slightly different from the existing protections under California’s Pregnancy Disability Law. That law provides unpaid leave for an employee disabled by pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, including time off needed for recovery from loss or end of pregnancy. An employee is eligible for this protection on day one of employment. 

Retaliation – SB 497

This amendment to existing laws is intended to put the burden of proof onto the employer to show that an employer’s action against an employee was not retaliation. 

Under the new law, the burdens of proof under Labor Code Sections 98.6 and 1197.5 will change from the employee to the employer if the employee was discharged or otherwise retaliated against within 90 days from the employee engaging in protected activity. This presumption of retaliation is rebuttable by the employer by establishing a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for the adverse action. The new law also adds a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per employee, to be awarded directly to the employee by the Labor Commissioner.

Cannabis – AB 2188 and SB 700

The use of cannabis has been lawful in California since 2016. Two new laws take effect January 1 that restrict an employer’s ability to take action against an employee for off-duty (and off-site) cannabis use. Nothing in these new laws – or any law – protect an employee who is under the influence and/or impaired from cannabis (or alcohol, or other drugs) while on duty and/or on the work site.

AB 2188 was passed last year with a one-year delay in enforcement. That law amends the California Fair Employment and Housing Act to prohibit employment discrimination based on a person’s use of cannabis off the job and away from the workplace. The law also prohibits adverse action based on a drug test that identifies only non-psychoactive cannabis metabolites in the applicant’s hair, blood, urine, or other bodily fluids. 

SB 700 was enacted this past fall and restricts an employer’s ability to ask about prior cannabis use in the hiring process.

Employers must revise their anti-discrimination policies. You will also want to review and potentially revise job applications, pre-employment testing programs, and drug and alcohol policies.

Compensation

As of January 1, 2024, all California employers, regardless of size, must pay their employees at least a minimum wage of $16.00 per hour. Please be mindful of local minimum wage ordinances. 

The minimum salary that must be paid to exempt employees in California is a function of the minimum wage. Workers paid under the Administrative, Executive or Professional exemption must be paid at least two times the appropriate minimum wage based on a 40-hour workweek -$66,650.

The Computer Software overtime exemption requires a minimum hourly rate of pay of $55.58, which means a minimum monthly salary of $9,646.96, or minimum annual salary of $115,763.35.

Also, it is imperative that you review your timekeeping and pay procedures. Nonexempt employees’ meal breaks must be no less than 30 minutes. Rounding is not acceptable. And the meal period must be taken before the fifth hour of work. Employers must provide nonexempt employees with the opportunity to take their rest breaks in a timely manner.

Also, you must include all forms of compensation when calculating the regular rate of pay. This means that when an employee is entitled to a meal period premium, rest break premium, or overtime pay, you must consider all forms of compensation – bonuses, etc., – to determine the rate of pay.

Workplace Violence Prevention Program Requirements – SB 553

Beginning July 1, 2024, covered employers must have a Workplace Violence Prevention Program. Employers must record information in a violent incident log for every workplace violence incident. Workplace violence is any act of violence or threat of violence that occurs in a place of employment. It does not include lawful acts of self-defense or defense of others. Employers must maintain documentation, including workplace violence hazard identification, evaluation, and correction, as well as training and investigation records.

Employers must provide training to employees on the Workplace Violence Prevention Program, and to train when a new or previously unrecognized workplace violence hazard is identified and when changes are made to the plan.

The agency responsible for enforcement of this new law is Cal-OSHA, which must also propose standards (regulations) by December 1, 2025.

Noncompete Agreements are Still Completely Illegal – SB 699 & AB 1076

Noncompete agreements are illegal! California’s unfair competition law, set out in Business & Professions Code §16600, voids contracts that restrain employees from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business. There are very limited exceptions for situations like the sale of a business or ownership interest.

SB 699 provides that noncompete agreements are unenforceable no matter where the agreement was signed, or when, and bars employers from attempting to enforce a void contract regardless of whether the contract was signed, and the employment was maintained outside of California. If an employer tries to have an employee sign such an agreement, without intent to enforce, to increase the odds that the employee does not try to compete, the employer will automatically commit a civil violation. The employee may file a lawsuit for injunctive relief or the recovery of actual damages, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

The second law, AB 1076 amends Section 16600 by explicitly requiring that its prohibition on noncompete agreements must be broadly construed to void any employment noncompete provision, no matter how narrowly tailored, unless one of the exceptions applies.

If an employer has current or former employees who signed noncompete agreements, the employer must notify them in writing by February 14, 2024, that the noncompete clause or agreement is void. Failure to provide this written notice is itself a violation and is an act of unfair competition under the statute.

This is just a summary of some of the changes to California’s employment laws.

Please do not hesitate to contact us with questions!