Tag Archives: news

2026 California Employment Update – New Year, New You!

As we embark on 2026, here’s what you need to know to tackle the new employment laws!

Employee Pay. As of January 1, 2026, California’s minimum wage is $16.90. This covers all California employers, regardless of size, except fast food restaurant employees, who must be paid a minimum of $20.00 per hour and certain health care workers who also have a higher minimum. Be mindful of local minimum wage ordinances, too, which are usually based on the employee’s work location. 

The minimum salary that must be paid to exempt employees in California is a function of the minimum wage. Workers paid under the Administrative, Executive or Professional exemption must be paid at least two times the appropriate minimum wage based on a 40-hour workweek: $70,304. The Computer Software overtime exemption requires a minimum hourly rate of pay of $58.85, which means a minimum monthly salary of $10,214.44, or minimum annual salary of $122,573.13. Remember that the exempt salary rate is the minimum – there is no such thing as a part-time exempt salary rate (you cannot pay a pro-rata amount).

Paid Family Leave Expansion (SB 590). California’s Paid Family Leave is modified as of the first of the year to track California’s Paid Sick leave law and the California Family Rights Act and now includes an employee’s “designated person.” An employee who takes time off to care for a seriously ill “designated person” can receive the wage replacement benefits under California’s Paid Family Leave (PFL) program. A PFL “designated person” is a person who is related by blood or whose association with an individual is the equivalent of a family relationship. The rule requires that when an employee initially requests PFL benefits to care for a designated person, they must identify the designated person and under penalty of perjury attest that the person is related by blood or that the person is in an equivalent family relationship.

Workplace Know Your Rights Act (SB 294). Starting February 1, 2026, employers must provide a written notice to each current employee of certain employee rights. Employees hired after February 1 must also be provided the notice, and everyone is to get it annually. Don’t reinvent the wheel – use the notice that the Labor Commissioner developed – available here in English and here in Spanish.

The notice must clearly explain workers’ rights about:

  • Workers’ compensation benefits, including disability pay and medical care for work-related injuries or illness, and contact information for the Division of Workers’ Compensation.
  • A summary of employee’s rights to immigration inspection notices and protections against unfair immigration-related practices.
  • Union organizing and concerted activity.
  • Constitutional rights during interactions with law enforcement at the workplace, including Fourth and Fifth Amendment protections.

The notice must also include:

  • New legal developments under laws enforced by the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, as identified by the Labor Commissioner.
  • A list of enforcement agencies responsible for those rights.

The Labor Commissioner will post a video online by July 1, 2026, that will explain employers’ obligations and employees’ rights.

By March 20, 2026 (and upon hire thereafter), employers must give employees the opportunity to identify an emergency contact. Employers must notify an employee’s designated emergency contact if the employee is arrested or detained on the worksite. If the action occurs off-site, but during work hours or while the employee is performing work, the employer must notify the contact if the employer has actual knowledge of the arrest or detention.

Employers may not discriminate or retaliate against an employee for exercising or attempting to exercise their rights under the Act. The Labor Commissioner, a public prosecutor, or the employee (in a civil action) may enforce the Act, and the employee may obtain injunctive relief, penalties, punitive damages, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. The penalties for violations of this new Act are per employee per violation, up to a maximum of $10,000 per employee.  

Employee Mobility (AB 692). California generally does not allow employers to restrict employee mobility; noncompete provisions and agreements are unlawful. The legislature is now working to limit the use of “Stay or Pay” provisions that restrict movement. The new law makes it unlawful for contracts entered into after January 1, 2026, to require employees to pay their employer, training provider, or a debt collector for a debt if the employee’s employment or work relationship ends. It also bars contracts that impose any penalty, fee or costs on a worker if the employment ends. Debts, penalties, fees, or costs include employment-related or education related costs, replacement hiring fees, retraining fees, reimbursement for immigration or visa-related costs, and other fees. Enforcement is by a civil action by the employee (and can include others similarly situated).

The new law allows some repayment obligations to continue:  some signing bonuses; government loan assistance or repayment programs, tuition assistance, enrollment in apprenticeship programs, and contracts related to the lease, finance, or purchase or residential real estate.    

Preservation of Training Records (SB 513). This new law expands employer recordkeeping obligations under Labor Code section 1198.5 to include education and training records that you already maintain as part of the personnel file . Employers must retain these records, which should include the names of the employee and training provider, duration and date of the training, the core competencies of a training (such as any skills in equipment or software obtained in the training), and the resulting certification or qualification. With this change, employers must include education and training records as part of the employee’s personnel file when requested under section 1198.5.

Amendment to Equal Pay Act (SB 642). This new law continues the revisions and modifications to the Equal Pay Act. The definition of “pay scale” is amended so that job postings must include “a good faith estimate of the salary or hourly wage range that the employer reasonably expects to pay for the position upon hire.”

The amendment also adds definitions for “sex,” “wages,” and “wage rate” to Labor Code 1197.5, which prohibits employers from paying employees who perform substantially similar work differently based on the employee’s sex. The new definitions clarify that “wages” and “wage rate” include all forms of pay, including but not limited to salary, overtime pay, bonuses, stock or stock options, profit sharing and bonus plans, vacation and holiday pay, and other benefits. Employers must ensure that employees who perform substantially similar work are not paid differently and are not entitled to different benefits on the basis of sex. The Act’s language regarding equal pay for substantially similar work has also been amended to apply to employees of “another sex,” (instead of the “opposite sex”), making the language inclusive of non-binary people.

The amendment expands the statute of limitations from two to three years, and employees may also obtain relief for the entire period that the violation existed up to a maximum of six years. The new law adds language specifically outlining that a cause of action for violation of the Act occurs when: (1) an alleged unlawful compensation decision or other practice is adopted; (2) an individual becomes subject to an alleged unlawful compensation decision or other practice; or (3) when an individual is affected by the application of an alleged unlawful compensation decision or other practice.

This is just a summary of some of the changes to California’s employment laws.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions!

Employer Rights and Responsibilities Regarding Law Enforcement (including ICE) at Worksites

No matter which industry you are in, where you are located, or what your impression of your workforce may be, many employees (and employers) are very concerned about ICE personnel coming onto the worksite. Workers experiencing this stress include citizens and non-citizens alike. Many employees lawfully permitted to work in the U.S. whether that be due to being natural born citizens, naturalized citizens, or those with work visas have concerns that they may be misidentified by enforcement agencies. This is a quick post containing some basic information, and to let you know that we are here to assist you.

Our general reminder is that law enforcement agencies, including ICE, may only enter a private workplace with the owner’s permission or a warrant. We recommend that you only permit entry with a lawful warrant (meaning, don’t give permission). The warrant must be signed by a judge and have a court’s name at the top. Even if you do not believe you have any issues, it is best not to let an enforcing agency (ICE, Police, DLSE, FBI, Homeland Security, the DOJ) roam your private property, as their goal is to find something to enforce.

If ICE (or any other law enforcement agency) says they have a warrant – do not just take their word for it! Ask for a copy and take the time to carefully read it. Pay particular attention to what the warrant authorizes them to do and limit their entry and review to only what is described in the warrant. If you permit them to exceed the scope of the warrant, they will be able to argue that you gave them permission to do so, and this could expose you to liability. Monitor the agent’s actions on site. Follow them during the inspection and document everything reviewed, accessed or seized.

Remind your staff that running away from law enforcement, including ICE, often gives the agents a reason to catch and arrest the person, even if that person was not initially the subject of the warrant. Workers should not hide from agents. However, please remind your workers that they have a right to stay silent and ask to talk to a lawyer. Keep in mind that you have those same rights as well!

We strongly suggest that you develop a response plan that all your workers, but especially your managers and supervisors, know about. You want all workers to know what to do and who to call if ICE comes to the workplace with or without a warrant. You should designate a person who will be responsible for speaking to and coordinating with ICE agents. Let all employees know who that person is and make sure all documents and contact requests are directed to that person. Give staff explicit directions that they have no authority to permit ICE agents onto the property. Tell them to say: “I can’t give you permission. It is not within my authority. Please wait here until I get a manager authorized to speak with you. Or. Please go to the office at [main office address].” Your designated person should know to call your legal counsel immediately.

Also, please remember that should any of your employees be detained or arrested, that this detention/arrest is not a conviction or legal determination that the employee was not authorized to work on this country, and you should take no adverse employment action against them prior to discussing the situation with your employment attorneys.

As mentioned above, this is just a quick reminder of your rights, your employees’ rights, and our recommendations. Please contact us with specific questions and we will endeavor to keep you updated.

2025 Employment Law Update

Happy New Year! My resolution: maybe, slightly less procrastination. But . . . for the most part, these laws don’t take effect until January 1, 2025. So, I’m not really “late.” (The exception is PAGA reform).

Here’s what you need to know to tackle the new employment laws for 2025!

The PAGA Reforms (AB 2288 and SB 92). In June 2024, several reforms of PAGA were enacted. In brief, if a California employer receives a notice on behalf of a former or current employee about alleged PAGA violations, legal counsel should be contacted immediately as there are important steps that can be taken to minimize liability. In addition, employers receive significant benefits under the reforms if they have already taken steps to identify and remedy wage and hour issues in their pay practices.

It is imperative that you regularly review your timekeeping and pay procedures. An annual detailed wage and hour audit and regular review of employer practices is critical to avoid or at least minimize expensive representative claims. Nonexempt employees’ meal breaks must be no less than 30 minutes. Rounding is not acceptable. And the meal period must be taken before the end fifth hour of work. Employers must provide nonexempt employees with the opportunity to take their rest breaks in a timely manner. When an employee is entitled to overtime pay, paid sick leave, a meal period premium, or a rest break premium, the employer must consider all forms of compensation and determine the regular rate of pay for such payments – an amount higher than the hourly rate of pay.

Minimum Wage Increase. As of January 1, 2025, all California employers, regardless of size, must pay their employees at least a minimum wage of $16.50 per hour. Please be mindful of local minimum wage ordinances. 

The minimum salary that must be paid to exempt employees in California is a function of the minimum wage. Workers paid under the Administrative, Executive or Professional exemption must be paid at least two times the appropriate minimum wage based on a 40-hour workweek: $68,640.  The Computer Software overtime exemption requires a minimum hourly rate of pay of $56.97, which means a minimum monthly salary of $9,888.12, or minimum annual salary of $118,657.43.

Accrued Vacation and California Paid Family Leave (AB 2123). Employers cannot require employees to take up to two weeks of earned but unused vacation days before they can begin receiving wage replacement benefits under the Paid Family Leave program. Employers should review their handbooks and other policy documents to delete any such rules.

Restrictions on Driver’s License Requirements (SB 1100). Employers cannot tell job applicants that a driver’s license is required for a job unless the employer reasonably expects driving to be a job function for the position and that using an alternative form of transportation would not be comparable in terms of time and cost to the employer. Employers should review their job postings, applications, and offer letters to remove any unnecessary (and now illegal) driver’s license requirements.

Changes and Expansions to Protections for Victims of Violence (AB 2499).  This law expands the protections available for crime victims. It broadens the definition of “victims” to include those who are a victim of certain acts of violence (domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, among others) regardless of whether anyone is arrested for, prosecuted, or convicted of committing any crime. In addition, the law provides that employees may use vacation, personal leave, or paid sick leave for any protected time off for jury duty, court appearances, and for victim time off. Finally, employers must provide written notice of the rights established under this bill to new hires, to all employees annually, at any time upon request, and any time the employer becomes newly aware that an employee or an employee’s family member is a victim. Employer handbooks, onboarding documents and other employee resources should be reviewed and updated.

Captive Audience Meetings are Banned (SB 399). California employers must be cautious about required/mandatory meetings. Employers will be subject to a civil penalty and civil action if they hold mandatory meetings where the purpose of the meeting is to communicate the employer’s opinion about religious or political matters. “Political matters” means matters relating to elections for political office, political parties, legislation, regulation, and the decision to join or support any political party or political or labor organization. “Religious matters” means matters relating to religious affiliation and practice and the decision to join or support any religious organization or association.

Model Whistleblower Poster (AB 2299). Employers that post the Labor Commissioner’s model notice about whistleblower protections will be deemed in compliance with the state’s whistleblower posting requirements. You can get a copy here. Print it out and post it today.

Intersectionality of Protected Characteristics (SB 1137). Several California laws – including the FEHA – are amended to clarify that their protections prohibit discrimination on the basis of individual protected characteristics and where there is intersectionality (i.e., a combination) of two or more protected characteristics. This law confirms existing caselaw, but it is an important clarification.

“Social Compliance Audits” (AB 3234). Some employers voluntarily conduct “social compliance audits.” These audits are voluntary, non-governmental inspections or assessments of an employer’s operations or practices to evaluate whether the operations or practices are in compliance with state and federal labor laws, including wage and hour and health and safety regulations, including those regarding child labor. This new law requires employers who conduct these audits to post on their website a report detailing the audit’s findings of the employer’s compliance with child labor laws.   

This is just a summary of some of the changes to California’s employment laws.

Please do not hesitate to contact us with questions!